Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 1149 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - $52.46 vs $569.99
- Up to 90% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i9-13900KS - $0.23 vs $2.37 per FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 35 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 5% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Athlon 3000G - 240 vs 229 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 32 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
229
95%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$52.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $52.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
240
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.37/FPS
9%
Price, $
$569.99
9%
FPS Winner
Buy for $569.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 132 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i9 |
Picasso | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 150 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |