Buy on Amazon
$445
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $999
Availability
MSRP in USD: $999
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-7820X outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-7820X is 45 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820X
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield IV than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 415 vs 403 FPS
- Up to 23% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $445.0 vs $576.53
- Up to 25% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $1.07 vs $1.43 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 140 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7820X - 32 vs 16 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-7820X
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
415
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.07/FPS
100%
Price, $
$445
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i7 i7-7820X Octa-core 8 Core 3.60 GHz Processor Socket R4 LGA-2066
Buy for $445 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
403
97%
Value, $/FPS
$1.43/FPS
74%
Price, $
$576.53
77%
AMD YD195XA8AEWOF Ryzen Threadripper 1950X (16-core/32-thread) Desktop Processor
Buy for $576.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-7820X
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7820X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Skylake-E/EP | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 16 |
| 16 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
