Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 1510 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - $59.99 vs $369.57
- Up to 78% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i7-14700F - $0.35 vs $1.62 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 35% better in World of Warcraft than Athlon 3000G - 228 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 28 vs 4 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
169
74%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
228
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.62/FPS
21%
Price, $
$369.57
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for $369.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i7 |
Picasso | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 20 |
4 | Threads | 28 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |