Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 1348 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 29% better in Starfield than Core i9-10900 - 81 vs 63 FPS
- Up to 26% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - $323.53 vs $435.0
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900 - 28 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $323.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74051 minutes ago
Buy for $435 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74053 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1704
61.4054054054054%
Multi-Core
8421
48.58642972536349%
Intel Core i7-14700F | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
20 | Cores | 10 |
28 | Threads | 20 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |