Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7700 outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7700 is 1533 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700
- Performs up to 15% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-6300 - 174 vs 151 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i7-7700 - $74.04 vs $167.0
- Up to 49% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-7700 - $0.49 vs $0.96 per FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $167 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16314 minutes ago
Buy for $74.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16314 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7700 | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |