Buy on Amazon
$180
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700K is 971 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Performs up to 6% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Celeron G1610 - 123 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i7-6700K - $37.0 vs $180.0
- Up to 78% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i7-6700K - $0.32 vs $1.46 per FPS
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700K - 55 vs 91 Watts
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Intel Core i7-6700K
Buy for $180 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7683 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7682 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i7-6700K
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700K | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 91 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
