Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700 is 752 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Performs up to 42% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-3250 - 349 vs 246 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i7-6700 - $56.34 vs $129.0
- Up to 38% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-6700 - $0.23 vs $0.37 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $129 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8185 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
FPS
246
70%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$56.34
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $56.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8184 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700 | vs | Intel Core i3-3250 |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 9th, 2013 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |