Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4820K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4820K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 3781 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4820K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4820K
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $199.88 vs $528.99
- Up to 51% better value when playing Borderlands 3 than Core i9-14900F - $0.99 vs $2.04 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 29% better in Borderlands 3 than Core i7-4820K - 259 vs 201 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4820K - 32 vs 8 threads
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
201
77%
Value, $/FPS
$0.99/FPS
100%
Price, $
$199.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $199.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
259
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.04/FPS
48%
Price, $
$528.99
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for $528.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4820K | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
130 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |