Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5820K outperforms Core i7-4800MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-5820K is 490 days newer than Core i7-4800MQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4800MQ
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than Intel Core i7-5820K - 47 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5820K
- Performs up to 1% better in DOOM Eternal than Core i7-4800MQ - 478 vs 473 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4800MQ - 12 vs 8 threads
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
FPS
478
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.9/FPS
100%
Price, $
$429.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $429.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 131 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4800MQ | vs | Intel Core i7-5820K |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2014 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Haswell E |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |