Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4750HQ outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4750HQ is 1494 days older than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4750HQ
- Performs up to 1% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than EPYC 7551P - 164 vs 162 FPS
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 47 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4750HQ - 64 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-4750HQ
Mobile • May 27th, 2013
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4750HQ | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| May 27th, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | EPYC |
| Crystal Well | Codename | Naples |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 32 |
| 8 | Threads | 64 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 5200 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
