Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700T outperforms Core i7-4600M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6700T is 730 days newer than Core i7-4600M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 2% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-4600M - 127 vs 124 FPS
- Consumes up to 5% less energy than Intel Core i7-4600M - 35 vs 37 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4600M - 8 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
127
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $99.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4889 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4600M | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
37 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |