Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100 outperforms Core i7-4600M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8100 is 1495 days newer than Core i7-4600M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4600M
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i3-8100 - 37 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-4600M - 157 vs 155 FPS
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
157
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.7/FPS
100%
Price, $
$110
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $110 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4921 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4600M | vs | Intel Core i3-8100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
37 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |