Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Core i7-4600M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1460 days newer than Core i7-4600M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4600M
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 37 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 1% better in God of War than Core i7-4600M - 171 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4600M - 16 vs 4 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-4600M
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-4600M
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
1026
87.84246575342466%
Multi-Core
1956
33.759061097687265%
Intel Core i7-4600M | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket G3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
37 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
