Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Core i7-3940XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1823 days newer than Core i7-3940XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3940XM
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 55 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 7% better in Borderlands 3 than Core i7-3940XM - 216 vs 201 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3940XM - 16 vs 8 threads
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
216
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 128 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Mobile • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3940XM | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |