Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 2348 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Up to 47% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $95.0 vs $179.0
- Up to 35% better value when playing Far Cry 6 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $0.97 vs $1.5 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 77 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 21% better in Far Cry 6 than Core i7-3770 - 119 vs 98 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 24 vs 8 threads
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 158 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
119
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.5/FPS
64%
Price, $
$179
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for $179 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 159 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |