Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2923 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $122.03 vs $225.99
- Up to 40% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-10700F - $0.71 vs $1.18 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 11% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-3770 - 191 vs 172 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 16 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
172
90%
Value, $/FPS
$0.71/FPS
100%
Price, $
$122.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $122.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4682 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
191
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.18/FPS
60%
Price, $
$225.99
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4683 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |