Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4160T outperforms Core i7-3687U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4160T is 559 days newer than Core i7-3687U.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3687U
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than Intel Core i3-4160T - 17 vs 35 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Performs up to 5% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-3687U - 116 vs 111 FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i7-3687U
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2013
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3687U | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
17 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
