Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms Core i7-3687U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 1456 days newer than Core i7-3687U.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3687U
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Celeron G3930 - 17 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 1% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-3687U - 112 vs 111 FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
112
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.92
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $63.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3687U | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
17 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |