Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms Core i7-3687U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 2371 days newer than Core i7-3687U.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3687U
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 17 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 6% better in Escape From Tarkov than Core i7-3687U - 201 vs 189 FPS
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
201
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$81.39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $81.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2491 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3687U | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |