Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3250 outperforms Core i7-3687U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-3250 is 152 days newer than Core i7-3687U.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3687U
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than Intel Core i3-3250 - 17 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Performs up to 1% better in The Callisto Protocol than Core i7-3687U - 75 vs 74 FPS
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
FPS
75
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.75/FPS
100%
Price, $
$56.34
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $56.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2013
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3687U | vs | Intel Core i3-3250 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 9th, 2013 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
17 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |