Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Core i7-3610QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 1893 days newer than Core i7-3610QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3610QM
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 45 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 2% better in World of Tanks than Core i7-3610QM - 517 vs 506 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3610QM - 64 vs 8 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-3610QM
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2012
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3610QM | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | EPYC |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Naples |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 32 |
| 8 | Threads | 64 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
