Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms Core i7-3520M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 1894 days newer than Core i7-3520M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3520M
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 6% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-3520M - 119 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3520M - 32 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
119
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.84/FPS
100%
Price, $
$576.53
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $576.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 111 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Jun 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3520M | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Jun 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |