Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900X outperforms Core i7-3520M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900X is 2329 days newer than Core i7-3520M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3520M
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900X - 35 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900X
- Performs up to 50% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-3520M - 376 vs 250 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3520M - 20 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
376
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.57/FPS
100%
Price, $
$590
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $590 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jun 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3520M | vs | Intel Core i9-9900X |
---|---|---|
Jun 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 165 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |