Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4160T outperforms Core i7-2920XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4160T is 1295 days newer than Core i7-2920XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2920XM
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-2920XM - 178 vs 166 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i7-2920XM - 35 vs 55 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i7-2920XM
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2920XM | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Core i3 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 55 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
