Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4160T outperforms Core i7-2860QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4160T is 1051 days newer than Core i7-2860QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2860QM
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Performs up to 3% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i7-2860QM - 332 vs 321 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i7-2860QM - 35 vs 45 Watts
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2860QM | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |