Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Core i7-2820QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 2369 days newer than Core i7-2820QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2820QM
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 45 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 1% better in Dead Space than Core i7-2820QM - 147 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2820QM - 64 vs 8 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-2820QM
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2820QM | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | EPYC |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Naples |
| Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 32 |
| 8 | Threads | 64 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
