Buy on Amazon
$89
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $112
Availability
MSRP in USD: $112
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-2700K outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-2700K is 308 days older than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K
- Performs up to 2% better in Valheim than FX-4130 - 192 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i7-2700K - $22.92 vs $89.0
- Up to 74% better value when playing Valheim than Core i7-2700K - $0.12 vs $0.46 per FPS
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Intel Core i7-2700K Quad-Core Processor 3.5 GHz 8 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80623I72700K
Buy for $89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18464 minutes ago
AMD FX-Series FX-4130 CPU Used 4-Core 4-Thread Desktop Processor 3.8 GHz 4M 125W Socket AM3+
Buy for $22.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18464 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i7-2700K
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
FX-4130
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2700K | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 24th, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
| Core i7 | Collection | FX |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
