Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3250 outperforms Core i7-2675QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-3250 is 606 days newer than Core i7-2675QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2675QM
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i3-3250 - 45 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Performs up to 0% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i7-2675QM - 230 vs 229 FPS
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
FPS
230
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$55.32
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $55.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2675QM | vs | Intel Core i3-3250 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 9th, 2013 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 55 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |