Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms Core i7-2675QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 1910 days newer than Core i7-2675QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2675QM
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Celeron G3930 - 45 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 1% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i7-2675QM - 179 vs 177 FPS
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
179
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.92
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $63.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 107 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2675QM | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |