Buy on Amazon
$429.95
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5820K outperforms Core i7-2670QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-5820K is 1055 days newer than Core i7-2670QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2670QM
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than Intel Core i7-5820K - 45 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5820K
- Performs up to 11% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-2670QM - 168 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2670QM - 12 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-5820K
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
FPS
168
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.56/FPS
100%
Price, $
$429.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel CM8064801548435 CORE I7-5820K Processor (15M Cache, UP to 3.60 GHZ)
Buy for $429.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-2670QM
Mobile • Oct 12th, 2011
Core i7-5820K
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2670QM | vs | Intel Core i7-5820K |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2014 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell E |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
