Key Differences
In short — Core i7-2600S outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-2600S is 596 days older than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600S
- Performs up to 2% better in F1 22 than FX-4130 - 256 vs 251 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i7-2600S - $52.02 vs $235.0
- Up to 77% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i7-2600S - $0.21 vs $0.92 per FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
256
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
22.82608695652174%
Price, $
$235
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for $235 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 87 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
FPS
251
98.046875%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$52.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $52.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 87 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2600S | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |