Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700KF is 2093 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700KF
- Performs up to 24% better in Escape From Tarkov than Celeron G3930T - 235 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i7-13700KF - $39.0 vs $303.49
- Up to 84% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Core i7-13700KF - $0.21 vs $1.29 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
235
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.29/FPS
16%
Price, $
$303.49
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for $303.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-13700KF | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |