Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700KF outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700KF is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700KF
- Performs up to 17% better in Far Cry 5 than Core i9-10900F - 253 vs 217 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 24 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i7-13700KF - $225.0 vs $324.99
- Up to 19% better value when playing Far Cry 5 than Core i7-13700KF - $1.04 vs $1.28 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
253
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.28/FPS
81%
Price, $
$324.99
69%
FPS Winner
Buy for $324.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 211 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
217
85%
Value, $/FPS
$1.04/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 211 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-13700KF | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |