Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700K is 3258 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700K
- Performs up to 35% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G1610 - 203 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i7-12700K - $37.0 vs $227.99
- Up to 78% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-12700K - $0.25 vs $1.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i7-12700K - 55 vs 125 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
203
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.12/FPS
22%
Price, $
$227.99
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for $227.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-12700K | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Alder Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |