Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11800H outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-11800H is 1412 days newer than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11800H
- Performs up to 7% better in F1 22 than EPYC 7551P - 283 vs 264 FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 45 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-11800H - 64 vs 16 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i7-11800H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-11800H | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
May 11th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | EPYC |
| Tiger Lake | Codename | Naples |
| Intel BGA 1787 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 8 | Cores | 32 |
| 16 | Threads | 64 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
