Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700F is 2837 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700F
- Performs up to 50% better in Dirt 5 than Core i3-3250 - 215 vs 143 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i7-11700F - $56.34 vs $260.91
- Up to 68% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i7-11700F - $0.39 vs $1.21 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i7-11700F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-11700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
215
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.21/FPS
32%
Price, $
$260.91
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for $260.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15425 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
FPS
143
66%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$56.34
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $56.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15424 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-11700F | vs | Intel Core i3-3250 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 9th, 2013 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |