Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700F is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700F
- Performs up to 12% better in God of War than Celeron G3930T - 184 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i7-11700F - $39.0 vs $260.91
- Up to 83% better value when playing God of War than Core i7-11700F - $0.24 vs $1.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-11700F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-11700F doesn't have integrated graphics
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
184
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.42/FPS
16%
Price, $
$260.91
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for $260.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7143 minutes ago
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7143 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-11700F | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |