Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11375H outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-11375H is 1292 days newer than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11375H
- Performs up to 44% better in Counter-Strike 2 than EPYC 7551P - 424 vs 294 FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-11375H - 64 vs 8 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i7-11375H
Mobile • Jan 11th, 2021
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-11375H | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
Jan 11th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | EPYC |
| Tiger Lake | Codename | Naples |
| Intel BGA 1449 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 32 |
| 8 | Threads | 64 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Iris XE 96EU | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
