Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10750H outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10750H is 1008 days newer than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10750H
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than EPYC 7551P - 152 vs 147 FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 45 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10750H - 64 vs 12 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10750H | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | EPYC |
Comet Lake | Codename | Naples |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 32 |
12 | Threads | 64 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |