Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9600K is 199 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Performs up to 37% better in Starfield than Celeron G4900 - 63 vs 46 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i5-9600K - $68.02 vs $145.0
- Up to 36% better value when playing Starfield than Core i5-9600K - $1.48 vs $2.3 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600K - 54 vs 95 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11336 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
46
73%
Value, $/FPS
$1.48/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11336 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9600K | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |