Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 1225 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 2% better in Ready or Not than Core i3-6300 - 266 vs 262 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6300 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Up to 8% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - $94.08 vs $101.79
- Up to 5% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i5-9400F - $0.36 vs $0.38 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $101.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
262
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$94.08
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $94.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Core i3-6300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |