Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-6300 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-6800K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-6300 is 273 days older than the more expensive Core i7-6800K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Performs up to 1% better in F1 23 than Core i7-6800K - 209 vs 206 FPS
- Up to 11% cheaper than Core i7-6800K - $91.64 vs $103.0
- Up to 12% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i7-6800K - $0.44 vs $0.5 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 51 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6800K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6300 - 12 vs 4 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
209
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$91.64
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $91.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9970 minutes ago
Buy for $103 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9972 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6300 | vs | Intel Core i7-6800K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |