Buy on Amazon
$122.54
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8600T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-8600T is 454 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8600T
- Performs up to 8% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G3930T - 344 vs 320 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i5-8600T - $39.0 vs $122.54
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8600T doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
SIVOYEEL CPU Processor Intel Core I5-8600T I5 8600T 2.3 GHz Six-Core Six-Thread CPU Processor 9M 35W LGA 1151
Buy for $122.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74996 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G3930T Dual-core (2 Core) 2.7GHz Processor Socket H4 LGA-1151 OEM Pack-Tray Packaging Model CM8067703016211
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74996 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i5-8600T
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
43.52660841938046%
Multi-Core
948
20.334620334620336%
Intel Core i5-8600T | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
|---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 35 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
