Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-8400T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10320 is 759 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-8400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400T
- Up to 1% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $139.0 vs $139.99
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 6% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i5-8400T - 115 vs 108 FPS
- Up to 5% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i5-8400T - $1.22 vs $1.29 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400T - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400T doesn't have integrated graphics
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
108
93.91304347826087%
Value, $/FPS
$1.29/FPS
94.5736434108527%
Price, $
$139
100%
Buy for $139 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7106 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
115
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.22/FPS
100%
Price, $
$139.99
99%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $139.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7109 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Single-Core
1099
71.4100064977258%
Multi-Core
3884
83.96022481625594%
Intel Core i5-8400T | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |