Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-5675C on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-5675C is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 2132 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-5675C.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-5675C
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - $90.0 vs $165.86
- Up to 35% better value when playing New World than Core i5-11600KF - $0.8 vs $1.23 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 19% better in New World than Core i5-5675C - 135 vs 113 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-5675C - 12 vs 4 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 97 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
135
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.23/FPS
65%
Price, $
$165.86
54%
FPS Winner
Buy for $165.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-5675C | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
May 15th, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |