Buy on Amazon
$141.28
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $224
Availability
MSRP in USD: $224
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4690S outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4690S is 978 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690S
- Performs up to 47% better in Diablo IV than Celeron G3930 - 162 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i5-4690S - $63.92 vs $141.28
- Up to 33% better value when playing Diablo IV than Core i5-4690S - $0.58 vs $0.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-4690S - 51 vs 65 Watts
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i5-4690S LGA 1150 - BX80646I54690S
Buy for $141.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 131 minutes ago
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
110
67%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.92
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3930 Dual-core (2 Core) 2.90 GHz Processor - Socket H4 LGA-1151OEM Pack - 512 KB
Buy for $63.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 131 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-4690S
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4690S | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
| May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
