Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600KF is 1766 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i5-12600KF - $98.02 vs $152.73
- Up to 21% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i5-12600KF - $0.26 vs $0.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600KF - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600KF
- Performs up to 24% better in Battlefield IV than Celeron G3930 - 467 vs 377 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 16 vs 2 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
377
80%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
467
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
78%
Price, $
$152.73
64%
FPS Winner
Buy for $152.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i5-12600KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |