Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - $98.02 vs $143.7
- Up to 23% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-10600K - $0.57 vs $0.74 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 51 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 13% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G3930 - 193 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 12 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
171
88%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
193
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.74/FPS
77%
Price, $
$143.7
68%
FPS Winner
Buy for $143.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |