Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 18% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $98.02 vs $120.0
- Up to 7% better value when playing Valorant than Core i3-10320 - $0.14 vs $0.15 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 13% better in Valorant than Celeron G3930 - 791 vs 697 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
697
88%
Value, $/FPS
$0.14/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11273 minutes ago
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11272 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |