Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400 is 654 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 27% cheaper than Core i5-9400 - $88.0 vs $120.93
- Up to 24% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i5-9400 - $0.13 vs $0.17 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400
- Performs up to 5% better in Rocket League than Celeron G3930 - 715 vs 679 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 6 vs 2 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
679
94.96503496503496%
Value, $/FPS
$0.13/FPS
100%
Price, $
$88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
715
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.17/FPS
76.47058823529412%
Price, $
$120.93
72%
FPS Winner
Buy for $120.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
43.93063583815029%
Multi-Core
1043
21.751824817518248%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |